The objective of this study is to measure the city of Tehran’s environmental quality in 2006 (the
last census year). Primarily, with a comparative analysis of a variety of urban sustainability indicator models,
a collection of 54 indicators have been chosen and categorized as indicators of increase or decrease in urban
environmental quality in the form of a simple mathematical model. Based on the aforementioned model,
Tehran’s environmental quality in 2006, having obtained a score of 59.5%, has been evaluated as “middle
ranking”. After continuing the evaluation more meticulously, it became known that the individual healthcare
indicator with a 91% score and the safety and security indicator with a 19% score had the highest and lowest
quality respectively in the city. Repeating this evaluation in the future will show the condition of the city’s
movement toward establishing a sustainable city. Furthermore, it will clearly demonstrate the reasons affecting
the high or low speed of this movement.
Seifollahi, M. , & Faryadi, S. (2011). Evaluating the Quality of Tehran’s Urban Environment Based
on Sustainability Indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(2), 545-554. doi: 10.22059/ijer.2011.339
MLA
M. Seifollahi; Sh. Faryadi. "Evaluating the Quality of Tehran’s Urban Environment Based
on Sustainability Indicators", International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 2, 2011, 545-554. doi: 10.22059/ijer.2011.339
HARVARD
Seifollahi, M., Faryadi, S. (2011). 'Evaluating the Quality of Tehran’s Urban Environment Based
on Sustainability Indicators', International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(2), pp. 545-554. doi: 10.22059/ijer.2011.339
CHICAGO
M. Seifollahi and S. Faryadi, "Evaluating the Quality of Tehran’s Urban Environment Based
on Sustainability Indicators," International Journal of Environmental Research, 5 2 (2011): 545-554, doi: 10.22059/ijer.2011.339
VANCOUVER
Seifollahi, M., Faryadi, S. Evaluating the Quality of Tehran’s Urban Environment Based
on Sustainability Indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2011; 5(2): 545-554. doi: 10.22059/ijer.2011.339